Skeptics have targeted the book of Genesis for a very long time, especially the first eleven chapters. That is no surprise since the straightforward affirmations of the creation of the world, the first human couple, and the flood cannot be harmonized with the evolutionary dogma that permeates popular science. What is surprising is the growing number of religious people in general, and members of churches of Christ in particular, who have compromised the Genesis account of origins in favor of unproven evolutionary principles that originated, not from sound Biblical exegesis, but from atheism. For professed believers in the inspiration of scripture, who should know better, to distort the Bible in their attempts to harmonize it with evolution is shameful. What many of these compromisers have failed to accept is this: to deny the historical accuracy of the early chapters of Genesis forces you to deny the truthfulness of Jesus.
Jesus affirmed in John 8:44 that the devil exists, that he is a liar and murderer, and that he has been since “the beginning.” There is no doubt that Jesus is calling the attention of his listeners to the Genesis account of the entrance of sin into the world (Gen. 3:1-6). In answering a question about divorce, Jesus spoke of the creation of Adam and Eve, the formation of that first home, and declared that those historical events stood as authoritative precedents for the governance of modern homes and marriages (Matt. 19:3-6). In Matthew 24:37-39, Jesus affirmed his belief that Noah existed and that the Genesis account of the flood actually happened.
If the early chapters of Genesis do not report real, actual historical events, then Jesus was wrong, whether honestly mistaken or purposely dishonest. But if Jesus was wrong about the historical accuracy of Genesis, what else might he have been wrong about? If he cannot be trusted in his statements regarding the early chapters of Genesis, upon what basis should we trust anything else he said? One cannot consistently reject the historical accuracy of Genesis and at the same time accept the historical accuracy of Jesus.